Regular official training


Every company or organization will hire employees who have little orno knowledge and skills to work effectively. This has necessitatedcompanies and organizations ranging from industry to industry toembark on extensive regular training for the employees to equip themwith the necessary skills to perform their duties. Every industryconsiders regular official training as extremely necessary and vitalfor enhancing productivity in the workplace (Wentland, 2012). Someindustries such as transport and fire or manufacturing industrieswhich use heavy machinery require extensive trainings for theiremployees on regular basis. Industries working using computers arealso engaged in training their employees on regular basis. It is,however, worth noting that despite the importance attached totraining employees on regular basis, there are a number ofshortcomings that have been associated with regular official trainingof employees and or overtraining employees (Wentland, 2012). Thisresearch papers argues for the need to train employees on regularofficial basis and also presents contrary arguments to the regularofficial training of employees.

Arguments for

Avoid accidents at the workplace

has ensured that there are reducedaccidents at the workplace. Employees are trained on how to handlevarious machineries in industries that deal with manufacturing, roadconstruction or even building. These are industries which requirespecialized skills for the people operating the machinery (Adegoke,2010). Employees are also trained on ways of mitigating fireoutbreaks which reduces accident incidents. New machineries withdifferent operational functions are being developed and it isessential to ensure that the employees are having regular officialtraining to improve their skills and avoid accidents. Employees wholack skills are likely to cause errors which lead to accidents. ensures that employees are efficient andhence make no errors at the workplace.

Enhanced productivity

Regular training equips employees with the critical skills andknowledge for performance various job related tasks. For instance, anaccountant will be trained primarily on the ways of maintaining theaccounts of the organization. Equipping the employees with thenecessary skills ensures that they are productive and motivated atthe workplace. It is essential to note that employees who do not knowwhat they are meant to do are bored at the workplace and end up beingunproductive. Skills over certain tasks make the tasks simple andexciting for the employee (Wentland, 2012). An example is an employeewho is unable to work with computer software at the workplace andstruggles to get work done. Such an employee will find it extremelydifficult to deliver results as expected. However, a little regulartraining will ensure that such an employee performs his or her dutieswith ease.

Little supervision of employees

In many organizations and companies across the industries, everydepartment must have a supervisor whose job is to ensure that theemployees are doing what is expected of them. The supervisor is heldresponsible by the management for the duties of the employees andtheir performance. When workers are training and are subjected toregular official training about their job, they get acquainted withtheir jobs and therefore require little supervision (Adegoke, 2010).Supervisors work as guides to direct workers when they go wrong.However, when the employees are familiar with everything they aresupposed to do, it is not always necessary for the supervisor tomonitor them. This allows the supervisor to perform other duties.Such little supervision saves on time and resources for everyindustry.

Improvement of employee morale

Research has indicated that the regular official training foremployees across all the industries gives the employee job security,as well as satisfaction. Once an employee is satisfied with his orher job, he gets morale and motivation to work. Employees with greatsatisfaction will perform optimally at their workplace (Wentland,2012). Employees with improved morale will report low levels ofabsenteeism and employee turnover. This improves the overallperformance of the organization. Regular training will ensure thatemployees are updated on any new developments regarding their jobsuch as changes in technology or job description.

Adapting to changes in the workplace

In every industry today, there are numerous changes that are goingon such as changes in technology. Work ethics and various regulationsat the workplace also keep changing. Numerous companies andorganizations across all industries are using computers for datastorage and analysis. Be it a hospital, school, telecommunicationcompany or the transport sector, they are all relying on computertechnology to perform various tasks (Cassidy &amp Kreitner, 2009).Technology is extremely vibrant and companies keep on changing theirsystems to fit modern requirements. It is therefore essential to makesure that the employees are regularly trained to ensure that they canhandle the changes. Additionally, policies regarding ethics or workpolicies may change and the employees must be trained on the newpolicies.

Regular training creates chances of promotion

Trained employees end up becoming assets to the organization. Thisis because when employees are trained and they acquire the necessaryskills, they get promoted hence they hardly leave the organization(Wentland, 2012). It is also evident that the employees who aresubjected to regular training feel that they have a better chance ofbeing promoted in the organization they work for hence becoming anasset to the organization.

Arguments against regular official employee training

Loss of trained employees to competitors

There are instances where an organization may invest huge amount oftime and resources to train an employee who ends up being poached byrival organizations and offered a better salary. As stated earlier,when employees are regularly trained, they acquire essential skillsand knowledge. Many organizations or companies do not wish to investon regular employee training and therefore they poach on the alreadytrained employees (Cassidy &amp Kreitner, 2009). The greatestdisadvantage is that the organization which trains the employee hasno legal backing or reclaiming the employee. The main purpose forevery company or organization across all industries for training anemployee is to perform optimally for the organization. Theorganization may invest heavily on the employee training in the hopethat the employee will pay back through his or her exceptionalperformance.

Costly and time consuming

of employees requires time and resources.Organizations may be required to invite paid trainers who come andtrain the employees (Adegoke, 2010). Additionally, training occursduring working hours and therefore consumes working hours. This mayreduce productivity.

Stressful for employees

Regular trainings in an organization may end up being stressful andboring for some employees. Some employees assume that the training isnot necessary and the feel that they are being forced to attend thetrainings (Adegoke, 2010). Additionally, regular trainings may becomemonotonous hence stressing the employees.

Training focuses on theory

Majority of the trainings especially on management are theory basedand have little to do on the actual functions of the managers. Thisimplies that the trainings have little or no impact on the skills andknowledge of the job to the employees (Adegoke, 2010). In otherwords, this implies that the cost and time invested in the trainingmay not be equivalent to the productivity of the employees. Thetrainees in such scenarios may lose interest with the trainings.


Regular official employee training is extremely vital acrossall industries. Employees require training to perform their dutieseffectively and to avoid errors (Adegoke, 2010). Regular training hasnumerous advantages but there are also a few shortcomings associatedwith training employees. Reduction of accidents at the workplace,improved morale, increased productivity and adapting to changes inthe workplace are just but some of the advantages of regular officialtraining. It is also clear from the arguments above that the trainedemployees end up becoming assets to the organization after receivingpromotions. On the contrary, regular official training for allindustries might have negative effects to an industry (Cassidy &ampKreitner, 2009). To start with, the research paper has identifiedthat there are some employees who are trained and then they arepoached by other rival industries and paid better salaries. Theprocess of training employees is also costly and time consuming. Manyindustries will avoid the training due to insufficient resources. Thefocus on theory as opposed to the actual employee activities alsomakes the training ineffective. It is therefore worth asserting thatregular official training is indeed crucial for all industriesdespite the few shortcomings associated with it.


Wentland, D. M. (2012).&nbspStrategic training: Putting employeesfirst. Amherst, Mass: HRD Press.

Cassidy, C., &amp Kreitner, R. (2009).&nbspSupervision: Settingpeople up for success. Mason, OH: South-Western CengageLearning.

Adegoke, B. (2010).&nbspEffect of training on employees`productivity in public service organization. Germany:Grin Verlag.