How Going Green can Positively Impact Environment

HOW GOING GREEN CAN POSITIVELY IMPACT THE ENVIRONMENT 21

HowGoing Green can Positively Impact Environment

Environmentalconsiderations are now at the heart of almost every country in theglobe this is due to the increased level of environmental pollutionthat has been deemed as hurting. Although good environment has beenperceived as critical in the support of wildlife and humans byscientists, production of energy through the use of fossils and coalamong other non-clean sources have immensely impacted hosting a cleanenvironment (Griskevicius et al., 2010). Thus, going green is seen asa critical move in ensuring that there is clean environment. The ideaof going green should not only be seen in terms of personalinitiatives, but also as a community initiative. This is because mostindividuals may not be willing to change in case they view the ideaof going green as to benefit an individual alone rather than thecommunity. There are different positive effects of going green to theenvironment in this report, how going green would positively impactthe environment would be discussed. This report will discuss why itis important to go green.

Theproblem

Modernliving has led to negative impacts on the environment. For instance,the use of chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers has resultedin destruction of soil as well as contamination of water bodies,which are habitants for animals. The use of natural resources in theproduction of energy has led to the depletion of these naturalresources. The release of carbon dioxide to the environment has alsoled to negative impacts on the environment since it has beenindicated as a cause of global warming. Thus, due to the negativeimpacts on the environment caused by modern living, there is a needto adopt green techniques and alternatives so as to have positiveimpacts on the environment such as reducing the impact of globalwarming, have cleaner air and water, and preserve natural resources.

Goinggreen is an aspect that has been evaluated by different researchers.Going green is typically living a life as an individual as well asthe community, which is environmentally friendly and can sustain theearth (Tzschentke et al., 2004). It is more of recycling since itinvolves contribution towards maintaining the natural environment andmaintaining the ecological balance by preserving the planet and itsnatural resources and systems. It also entails steps whether big orsmall towards minimizing the harm done to the environment duringdaily activities, which includes the carbon footprints left behindbecause of inhabiting the planet. The chief idea that the researchershave been concerned with is whether people should focus on goinggreen given that going green is associated with some costs.Nevertheless, going green has been associated with different benefitsto the environment which indicates that, despite the cost associatedwith going green, it is worth undertaking the cost. Going green is anexpensive venture and most industries are still in the researchprocess, and it seems it will take a bit longer for consumers to havea wide selection of green products. However, according to a recentstudy, despite the high initial capital required to go green, it isworth it since it yields significant benefits.

Theconcept of going green has not yet been fully understood byindividuals, despite it being an important concept. To fullyunderstand the concept of going green, it encompasses five criticalprinciples. One of the principles is that going green encompassesreducing pollution or the toxin released to the environment. This isachieved by using cleaner and natural products for human consumption,reducing driving by using of public means if it is a must for one todrive, then one should drive the eco-friendly type of vehicles, andswitching to organically manufactured foods which do not requirefertilizers and other chemicals to grow. The second principle ofgoing green entails conserving energy, which is achievable throughusing the most infinite and green sources for energy production.During the conservation of energy, pollution is also reduced(Hussain, 2010). The third principle of going green entails thepreservation of resources. Since people live in the world whereresources are limited, and they continue to be scarce because of therapid growth of population and massive technological advancement,preservation of resources is critical to ensure sustainability forfuture generation. Thus for the Preservation of resources, it isimportant to use eco-friendly products that are environmentallyfriendly. Alternatively, the fourth principle encompasses supportingthe reduction of consumption and waste by emphasizing on the need forrecycling and reuse, which would help to minimize the use of newmaterials and use of unwanted materials in making other usableproducts. In addition, reduced consumption and less wastage resultsin the preservation of energy and resources, as well as, reduction inpollution. On the other hand, the fifth principle comprises ofprotecting the earth’s ecological balance (Hussain, 2010).

Humanbeings have spent many years trying to develop technology to makelife easier and cheaper. Indeed, life has become more convenient andmore comfortable as phones, cars, computers, and other electronicgadgets become introduced. However, they find that with time, therepercussions of advanced technology are profoundly felt over theyears, and people are slowly trying to forge to eco-friendly primarymeans of living. It is clear that going green is easier said thandone in the current provision (Jabbour &amp Jabbour, 2009). Thebehavior that people develop towards going green help in determiningwhether they are ready to go green or it is just a matter of faking.In the present age, it is not only individuals that forge to gogreen, but also businesses. Businesses have discovered that consumersare trying to identify or associate themselves with companies thatsupport the green initiative. Therefore, businesses do not seem tohave a lot of choice other than going green in order to appeal totheir customers. However, as businesses progress in undertaking thegreen initiatives, they end up getting used to it and the greeninitiatives become part of their culture (Mba, 2013).

Argumentsagainst Going Green

Differentarguments against going green have been put forward by those againstthe move of going green. One of the claims is that going greenimplies changing the lifestyle. According to the five principles ofgoing green, one has to change his/her lifestyle in order to ensurethat he/she identifies with the initiatives of going green. Take, forinstance, in case one is used to using a car that uses diesel, he/shehas to change the lifestyle and start using a car that does not usediesel such as an electric car. Changing from something that one hasbeen used to in his/her lifestyle is usually a stress to some peoplebecause not everyone is willing to change from the traditional ways.Most people are not willing to change their old lifestyles becausethey fear about new things that may come with new lifestyles. Forexample, a person may fear to change from a diesel car to an electriccar because he may fear the dangers that may be associated with anelectric car. Therefore, people that are against going green have aconcern that going green may lead to changing of lifestyle, which maycome with new challenges that they are not in a position to handle.They suggest that it is better to stay in the lifestyle that they areused to because they are conversant with how to solve challenges thatmay emerge. The change in lifestyle is costly because one has toundergo extra cost in ensuring that he/she goes green. For instance,in case one has a car that uses diesel, he/she will have to buyanother car that uses clean energy such as an electric car, if onehas to drive. Hence, changing to the green lifestyle seems expensive.

Anotherargument against the idea of going green is that some greentechnologies can disappoint at times. Solar energy have been claimedto fail heating homes during the winter evenings while wind turbinescan leave people in the dark where there is a prolonged drop in thebreeze that runs the turbines. Alternatively, biofuels denyindividuals the opportunity of having perfectly good food (Reed,2011). Also, the installation of these plants in order to producesufficient energy requires heavy investment.

Ithas also been claimed by those against the idea of going green thatsources of green energy such as wind have malicious un-environmentalconsequences, which render it to become even less friendly to usethis makes wind power as a green form of energy less attractive. Forinstance, 420 of the wind farms in Pennsylvania led to the death of10,000 bats in 2010 (Reed, 2011). Bats have been termed beneficialsince they eat millions of insects that destroy crops such as bugs.The reduction in the number of bats implies an increase in the numberof bugs. This increase is likely to make farmers spend more onpesticides. Besides, the bugs, if not controlled may lead to adecrease in food production which would have an impact of raisingfood prices to every individual (Reed, 2011). In such a scenario,going green is likely to be hurting rather than be a savior.

Oneof the principles of going green indicate that people should beencouraged to recycle and reuse products in an attempt to make theenvironment clean. Also, going green advocates for conservation ofenergy. In maintaining this initiative, the use of paper and plasticbags has been banned ad people have been encouraged to use reusablecloth bags in support of green initiative. However, considering allthe tradeoffs, reusable bags need more energy as well as otherresources in their manufacture it has been indicated that these bagsshould be used 103 times before yielding any environmental benefitsover plastic bags or paper (Reed, 2011). This is an indication thatalthough going green has been branded as an initiative that worksunder the principle of conserving energy, sometimes conservation ofenergy is not realized.

Goinggreen has also been associated with negative impacts. For instance,consider the impact of swapping fossil-fueled light duty vehicles. Anelectric car will need to remain charged always in order to functionappropriately since it cannot perform without charge. In case acountry is to consider switching from the fossil-fueled vehicles tothe electric vehicles, it implies that a lot energy will be needed inrealizing the plan (Reed, 2011). For instance, the electric cars willrequire having chargeable batteries that can store sufficient energyto enable the cars function. Making of these batteries will requireintensive energy during the manufacturing process, and will also posean environmental risk because of the hazardous wastes that may bedumped in the recycling plants. Alternatively, the electric cars willalso have the challenge of charging since the batteries would need tobe charged for the cars to function. This implies that there will beadditional requirements of energy that will be used to charge theelectric cars. Therefore, noticing the amount of energy required bythe electric cars, going green cannot always be considered as thebest alternative.

Argumentsfor Going Green

Differentpoints have suggested which are in favor of going green. Thesearguments are in terms of the benefits that accrue to going green.One of the arguments for going green is that going green is criticalsince it helps in the conservation of energy. By going green, one islikely to conserve energy. This is especially through the use ofgreen technologies. When green technologies are used, it is likelythat less energy will be used. Because less energy is used with thegreen technologies, households are likely to pay less for energy. Forinstance, consider initiatives, where households use green sources ofenergy such as solar and apply the green practices such as usingenergy efficient appliances. In such a situation, the households arelikely to pay less costs of energy.

Goinggreen is usually associated with the mitigation of pollution.According to Lake (2015), going green assists the environment throughmitigating the levels of pollution which enters water, soil and air.Through utilizing alternative energy sources as well as avoiding theuse of fossil fuels, reducing waste and recycling, less amounts ofpollutants become released to the environment. With reducedpollutants to the environment, humans are also likely to benefit fromimproved health this is because reduced levels of pollutants willresult in clean air and water which in turn promote healthy living(Harris et al., 2009).

Goinggreen is associated with the benefit of having reduced greenhouse gasemission. Greenhouse emissions are considered harmful to theenvironment because they are thought to play a significant role incontributing to global warming (Lake, 2015). When individuals adoptgreen practices, it is likely that the levels of greenhouse gassessuch as carbon dioxide would be reduced remarkably. For instance, theuse of a green car can help in lowering the level of carbon dioxide,which implies reduced levels of greenhouse gases. An environment thatis free from greenhouse gasses is critical in ensuring that qualityair is maintained (Lynes &amp Dredge, 2006).

Theuse of non-renewable sources of energy ensures that resources are notconserved. For example, burning of fossil fuels like coal, naturalgas and oil to generate electricity ensures that the resources areused without replacement. Burning of these fuels is harmful to theenvironment since they promote the release of greenhouse gasses tothe environment (Lake, 2015). Since these fuels are limited innature, they are not sustainable in the long-term. However, throughthe green practices, individuals are highly encouraged to userenewable resources a move that ensures that resources areconserved. Also, making use of alternative sources of energy andrecycling mitigates the use of non-renewable resources and cuts downon gasses released to the environment. Thus, going green isexceedingly critical in ensuring that resources are conserved(Hussain, 2010).

Anotherbenefit that is accrued by going green is having reduced waste. Goinggreen is exceedingly crucial in encouraging individuals to mitigatetheir conservation, recycle waste, as well as reuse commodities in anattempt to reduce waste (Tzschentke et al., 2004). Adopting of greenpractices ensures that the waste that could otherwise be dumped tothe environment is never in the environment. When there is less wastein the environment, it implies that there is a low risk of releasinggasses such as carbon dioxide to the environment for example,biodegradables are not left anyhow thus preventing the release ofgases. Thus, less waste ensures that the greenhouse gas effect iseliminated. Besides, with reduced amounts of waste in theenvironment, environmental quality is ensured that in turn supportshealthy lifestyles (Eyraudet al., 2011).

Thereis the need to strive to achieve the equilibrium formed because ofharmonious co-existence amid the plants, animals, and human beings(Knowles,2010).Humans have overstretched the earth limits in order to feed theincreasing population leaving the other creatures to suffer. Theintroduction of numerous man-made activities has led to such asignificant ecological imbalance as a result, so many livingorganisms are no longer on earth (Knowles,2010).Also, many plants are facing extinction losing many of them whichhave medicinal value and herbs that could potentially heal the deadlydiseases that are plaguing human being today. Going green isimportant ad beneficial since it ensures that different habitants arepreserved the preservation of these habitants ensures that wildlifeis also preserved (Lake, 2015).

Businessesthat adopt green technologies have been associated with success. Inmost cases, consumers usually associate themselves with products thatkeep the environment clean. Having this in mind, businesses that sellor produce products that are in line with the green initiatives havebeen indicated as successful. This is because customers tend toidentify with such businesses. Also, these businesses tend to besuccessful because they tend to conserve energy and reuse most of theused products in producing new products. This keeps their costs ofoperation low, making them to be successful.

Everyindustry and operation is usually different because of this, someare likely to see an immediate benefit while others will need to waita little longer and see the benefits in the long-term. It isimportant that one does not only look at the immediate benefits, butalso the long-term benefits that come along with the idea of goinggreen. Also, one has to look to some of the benefits that not usuallydirectly associated with the bottom line. Therefore, in case one doesnot look only at the immediate benefits or costs that emanate fromthe idea of going green, but the long-term benefits, it is likelythat people will definitely prefer going green.

Itis apparent that going green has different positive benefits to theenvironment due to this reasoning, it can be said that investing ingreen technology and supporting green practices is a worthinvestment. Going green may seem expensive in the short-term, but thelong-term benefits that are realized as a result of going greenexceed the cost of going green (Jabbour &amp Jabbour, 2009). Forexample, consider the cost of building up a wind plant in an area inorder to ensure clean energy. In the short-term, the cost of puttingup the wind plant may seem too high, but the benefits that will comewith the plant are numerous. Therefore, the cost incurred in goinggreen is worth, given the varied benefits that are associated withgoing green.

Howto Resolve the Problem

Inorder to resolve the problem caused by modern living on theenvironment, countries need to come up with legislation that citizensshould follow in order to reduce the negative impacts on theenvironment. The bodies that are charged with the responsibility ofmanaging the environment such as Environment Protection Agency (EPA)should be in the front line in formulating laws that encouragecitizens to use green technologies and alternatives. Also, countriesshould support one another in encouraging the use of greentechnologies and alternatives through forming an environmental blockthat focuses on the use of green technologies. Countries can alsoorganize education forums that can teach citizens the benefits ofgoing green for instance, the topic may be introduced in theeducation curriculum so as to help citizens have a betterunderstanding of green technology and alternatives.

Conclusion

Inconclusion, going green is typically living a life as an individualas well as the community, which is environmentally friendly and cansustain the earth. It is more of recycling since it involvescontribution towards maintaining the natural environment andmaintaining the ecological balance by preserving the planet and itsnatural resources and systems. It also entails steps whether big orsmall towards minimizing the harm done to the environment duringdaily activities, which includes the carbon footprints left behindbecause of inhabiting the planet. It is important that peopleconsider both personal as well as communal benefits, when assessingthe cost of going green. Through such a reflection, people will be ina position to see the larger benefits rather than simply seeing theindividual benefits. Going green may seem expensive in theshort-term, but the long-term benefits that are realized as a resultof going green exceed the cost of going green. Therefore, peoplesshould not only evaluate the idea of going green by looking at thecost of going green and the benefits in the short-term, but shouldhave an evaluation of the long-term benefits as a whole. As such, thecosts of going green will be perceived to be worth since the benefitswill be vast in the long-term.

AnnotatedBibliography

Clark,H.J. (2009). Chemistry Goes Green. NatureChemistry1, 12-13, doi: 10.1038/nchem.146.

Theauthor of this article is James H. Clark, who is a professional atthe University of York. The primary focus of the article entailsdiscussing how diminishing fossil fuel reserves, waste processes, aswell as hazardous substances have resulted in the introduction of thegreen technologies. It is due to the introduction of the greentechnologies that the author discusses how metals, substances andorganic compounds can be produced through clean and sustainableroutes. This source is relevant to the topic of discussion since theprimary aim of discussing the use of green chemistry in theproduction of different substances is to ensure that the environmentis protected. Thus, from the aspects discussed in the article, it isapparent that the article supports the chief idea of going green inorder to ensure that there are positive benefits to the environmentfor instance, the article points out the use of waste separationprocesses in ensuring that hazardous substances are not released tothe environment.

Mba,A. A. M. (2013). Greenmanufacturing (paradigm shift to sustainable capitalism).S.l.: Lulu Com.

Thisresource has been written by Mba Asefeso. The chief focus of thisresource is to discuss how going green has made a paradigm shift inthe way products are being manufactured. According to the resource,vast companies have now embraced the use of green manufacturing in anattempt to protect the environment. As they use green manufacturingin producing their products, the companies also benefit since theyappeal to their customers to purchase products from them. As aresult, most companies have become eco-friendly. The resourceidentifies positive benefits such as quality air and environmentalhealth that emanate from the large companies using greenmanufacturing to produce their products. This resource is relevant tothe topic of discussion since it provides an approach that companiesare using in order to ensure the environment is protected or receivespositive benefits. Also, the resource identifies some of theenvironment benefits from going green such as quality air.

Lynes,J. K., &amp Dredge, D. (2006). Going green: Motivations forenvironmental commitment in the airline industry. A case study ofScandinavian Airlines. Journalof sustainable tourism,14(2),116-138.

Theauthors try to elaborate on the meaning of going green. They statethat, going green is typically living a life as an individual as wellas the community, which is environmentally friendly and can sustainthe earth. It is more of recycling since it involves contributiontowards maintaining the natural environment and maintaining theecological balance by preserving the planet and its natural resourcesand systems. It also entails steps whether big or small towardsminimizing the harm done to the environment during daily activities,which includes the carbon footprints left behind because ofinhabiting the planet.

Hussain,S. S. (2010). The ethics of ‘going green’: the corporate socialresponsibility debate. Businessstrategy and the environment,8(4),203-210.

Theauthor tries to elaborate on the principles that can successfullylead to going green. He talks of five fundamental principlesinvolved, first is reducing pollution or the toxic released in theenvironment. This is achieved by using more cleaner and naturalproducts for human consumption reduce driving by use of public meansif it is a must to drive the eco-friendly type of vehicles, switch toorganically manufactured foods, which do not require fertilizers andother chemicals to grow. Secondly, conserve energy, which isachievable by using the most infinite and green sources for energyproduction. During the conservation of energy, pollution is alsoreduced. Third is the preservation of resources since we live in theworld in which resources are limited, and they continue to be becauseof the rapid growth of population and massive technologicaladvancement. Thus for the conservation of resources, it is importantto use eco-friendly products that are environmentally friendly.Fourth, there is the need to support the reduction of consumption andwaste by emphasizing the need for recycling and reuse that will helpto minimize the use of new materials and use of unwanted materials tomake other usable products. In addition, reduced consumption andwaste results in the preservation of energy and resources andpollution become less. Fifth is protecting the earth`s ecologicalbalance.

Jabbour,A. B. L., &amp Jabbour, C. J. (2009). Are supplier selectioncriteria going green? Case studies of companies in Brazil. IndustrialManagement &amp Data Systems,109(4),477-495.

Theauthors wonder if going green is worth it. They say that Human beingshave spent many years trying to develop technology to make lifeeasier and cheaper. Indeed, life has become more convenient and morecomfortable as phones, cars, computers, and other electronic gadgetsare introduced. However, they find that with time, the repercussionsof advanced technology are profoundly felt over the years, and peopleare slowly trying to forge to eco-friendly primary means of living.It is clear that going green is easier said than done in the currentprovision. For example, it takes a minute to change a gas-poweredvehicle to the hybrid. Therefore, the cost of going green may seem tobe too high in the short run, but it turns out to be beneficial inthe long run. Hence, it is worth going green.

Tzschentke,N., Kirk, D., &amp Lynch, P. A. (2004). Reasons for going green inserviced accommodation establishments. Internationaljournal of contemporary hospitality management,16(2),116-124.

Theauthor says that going green is an expensive venture and mostindustries are still in the research process, and it seems it willtake a bit longer for consumers to have a wide selection of greenproducts. Nevertheless, the author continues to say that accordingto a recent study, despite the high initial capital required to gogreen, it is worth it since it yields significant cost of savings inthe end. As well, people should eliminate the perception that goinggreen is meant for rich people since it all involves saving money andresources, which can be achieved even in small capacities. Havingthis in mind going green remains, a lingering question and here aresome eco-friendly methods that support its worthiness. Smart spendingis one of the methods it is not necessarily to go for expensivesolar panels, for example, rather looking around there are manysolutions that can be implemented without even using a penny. Buyingorganic food directly from the producer is less expensive than buyingthe groceries. Also, it is good to think long-term maybe when buyingthings that can be used and reused it is better to avoid beingthrifty. Example towels and napkins can be expensive at first, butthey can be used for a long time and reduce time to go back to storesand usage of money. Also, hazardous products can substitute withorganic household items a good example is the use of vinegar toclean wooden floors and things like baking powder to clean tiles.

Griskevicius,V., Tybur, J. M., &amp Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to beseen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journalof personality and social psychology,98(3),392.

Authorsof journalof personality and social psychologygive a method, which can help in reducing wastage. They talk of goingpaperless as a fundamental method which when implemented can save alot of paper waste and it costs nothing. Their view is that whenpeople can adapt the accessible way of mailing services, phonebilling, banking services, and other transactions, the results willbe complementing marketers to be more eco- friendly. They also findit prudent to reuse old newspaper as packaging materials, and excessto be sold to the junk shop for proper reuse.

Goinggreen is one of the most trending news with the variety of benefitsto individuals and the community as a whole. Applying green in dailyactivities creates a healthy environment, reduces unnecessarywastage, and leads the way to social changes. Going green does nothave to be so expensive to prove its worthiness. Little changes canlead to huge impact in the end. Educating oneself can be essential inlearning different ways of going green without affecting one’sbudget. This resource is relevant to the topic under study because itshows how one can go green in an attempt to support qualityenvironment.

Harris,N., Pisa, L., Talioaga, S. &amp Vezeau, T. (2009). HospitalsGoing Green: A Holistic View of the Issue and the Critical Role ofthe Nurse Leader. HolisticNursing Practice,Vol. 23 (2), pp. 101-111.

Accordingto this resource, the healthcare industry generates a lot of wasteevery year and constitutes one of the biggest consumers of energy inthe U.S. The authors of this article focus on how nurses can promote“green” hospitals and work towards environmental sustainability.The article indicates that through hospitals going green, they willbe in a position to mitigate the waste generated and thus help inpromoting a clean environment. The authors of the article argue thata quarter of the diseases experienced by the globe’s population canbe attributed to environmental exposures. This is to indicate that,in case the environment is kept clean, it would be feasible to keepsome of the health issues away. This resource is relevant to thetopic under consideration since it clearly shows the positive impactof going green as the article indicates, through hospitals goinggreen, it would be possible to eliminate some of the human problemsbrought about by unclean environment. Indeed, the article shows theimportance of having clean environment through going green. Theinformation provided in the article is valid because it has been wellresearched by authors who have knowledge in the area of study thiscan be supported through the integration of other sources which actas evidence of claims. The article shows that, going green helps inpromoting human health. Therefore, the article has the idea that itis worth going green.

Eyraud,L., Wane, A., Zhang, C. &amp Clements, B. (2011). Who’s GoingGreen and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment.InternationalMonetary Fund.

Theauthors of this article focus on providing why there is an increasein green investment. According to the article, green investment hasbecome a chief driver of the energy sector. The introduction ofpolicies that support green initiatives has helped in ensuring thatcountries consider green investment. Green investment has beenconsidered worth by countries since it has helped in protecting thenatural resources. This is so because green investment has led to theuse of renewable sources of energy. This resource is relevant to thetopic under consideration because it provides information on whycountries should consider investing in green sources. Through theauthors of this article supporting the idea on the use of renewablesources of energy, the article supports the idea that the costexperienced in going green is worth investing.

Lake,R. (2015). PositiveEffects on the Environment from Going Green.Livestrong Foundation.

Thefocus of this article is to show the positive impacts of going greenthe article highlights different benefits that accrue by going green.The author points out that people should be encouraged to live in anenvironmentally friendly manner. This would ensure that theenvironment is clean, which implies cleaner air, water andpreservation of natural resources. Among the benefits that thisarticle highlights include reduced waste, lower greenhouse gasgenerations, resource conservation, reduced pollution, and thepreservation of wildlife. This resource is relevant to the topic ofdiscussion since it indicates that there are positive benefits thatemanate from going green. Thus, the resource indicates that goinggreen is an investment that is worth.

Knowles,H. (2010). It`sSo Easy Going Green: An Interactive, Scientific Look at ProtectingOur Environment.New York: Lorenz Educational Press.

Theauthor of this resource points out that for the earth to be capableof functioning appropriately there is a need to maintain a certainbalance amid the plants, humans, and animals. Plants offer food aswell as materials to humans and animals while animals offer food andother materials for humans. Thus, it is crucial to ensure thatwildlife is preserved for the earth to function properly. Part of thewildlife has become extinct due to failure of protecting the habitatsas well the environment that surrounds them. According to the author,going green ensures that the environment as well as the habitats ofthe wildlife is preserved as a result of preserving the habitats ofthe wildlife, wildlife is preserved. This resource is relevant to thetopic under discussion because it argues that going green isbeneficial to the environment.

References

Clark,H.J. (2009). Chemistry Goes Green. NatureChemistry1, 12-13, doi: 10.1038/nchem.146.

Eyraud,L., Wane, A., Zhang, C. &amp Clements, B. (2011). Who’s GoingGreen and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment.InternationalMonetary Fund.

Griskevicius,V., Tybur, J. M., &amp Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to beseen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journalof personality and social psychology,98(3),392

Harris,N., Pisa, L., Talioaga, S. &amp Vezeau, T. (2009). HospitalsGoing Green: A Holistic View of the Issue and the Critical Role ofthe Nurse Leader. HolisticNursing Practice,Vol. 23 (2), pp. 101-111.

Hussain,S. S. (2010). The ethics of ‘going green’: the corporate socialresponsibility debate. Businessstrategy and the environment,8(4),203-210.

Jabbour,A. B. L., &amp Jabbour, C. J. (2009). Are supplier selectioncriteria going green? Case studies of companies in Brazil. IndustrialManagement &amp Data Systems,109(4),477-495.

Knowles,H. (2010). It`sSo Easy Going Green: An Interactive, Scientific Look at ProtectingOur Environment.New York: Lorenz Educational Press.

Lake,R. (2015). PositiveEffects on the Environment from Going Green.Livestrong Foundation.

Lynes,J. K., &amp Dredge, D. (2006). Going green: Motivations forenvironmental commitment in the airline industry. A case study ofScandinavian Airlines. Journalof sustainable tourism,14(2),116-138.

Mba,A. A. M. (2013). Greenmanufacturing (paradigm shift to sustainable capitalism).S.l.: Lulu Com.

Reed,G. (2011). Howgoing green goes against the environment. TheExaminer.

Tzschentke,N., Kirk, D., &amp Lynch, P. A. (2004). Reasons for going green inserviced accommodation establishments. Internationaljournal of contemporary hospitality management,16(2),116-124.